Independent technology guidance Research first. Recommendations second.

How We Research

Sitopedia’s research process begins with a decision, not a product list. We define the reader, the job to be done and the trade-offs that can change the outcome. This page explains the standard used for guides, comparisons and product profiles.

1. Define the decision

Before collecting products, we write a short decision brief: intended audience, real use case, budget or operating constraints, important risks and the evidence needed to reach a useful conclusion.

2. Prefer primary sources

We use official documentation, pricing pages, contracts, standards, regulatory guidance and vendor support material for product-specific claims. Independent sources may add context, but they do not replace the original source for current price, features, policies or technical requirements.

3. Record what was checked

Research pages retain source URLs and a verification date for time-sensitive information. Published guides show their research sources. A source list does not mean every source endorses our conclusion; it shows where material facts were checked.

4. Separate research from testing

We describe a product as hands-on tested only when a documented test was actually performed. Desk research, trial-account review, controlled testing and long-term use are different evidence levels and should not be presented as the same thing. We do not invent benchmarks, ownership experience or ratings.

5. Compare fit and limitations

A recommendation explains who it fits, what it does not solve, material limitations, credible alternatives and the conditions that could change the result. A high commission or familiar brand name is not a selection criterion.

6. Check commercial details again

Prices, plan names, availability and affiliate-program terms change. We recheck time-sensitive facts before publication and identify the date where it helps the reader. Readers should confirm final details on the provider’s official site before buying.

7. Human approval before publication

Software and automation may assist with collecting sources, organizing notes, preparing drafts or producing media. A human owner reviews the final package before it is published. Approval covers the article, sources, visuals, disclosures and intended destinations.

8. Update and correct

Material corrections are made when evidence shows a factual error or when a product change makes the existing conclusion misleading. Minor wording and formatting fixes may not receive a separate notice. For a correction request, email admin@sitopedia.com with the page URL, disputed statement and supporting source.